Log on / register
BioMed Central home | Journals A-Z | Feedback | Support
 

This article is part of the supplement: 17th International Symposium on Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine

Meeting abstract

Is `brain swelling' a clinical particular kind of severe brain injury?

R Bertault, P Gomis, M Jaussaud and T Debonne

Intensive Care Unit (SEYS GA), University Center Hospital Reims France

from 17th International Symposium on Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine
Brussels, Belgium. 18–21 March 1997

Critical Care 1997, 1(Suppl 1):P002doi:10.1186/cc8

Published: 1 March 1997

© 1997 Current Science Ltd

Introduction

Brain swelling (BS) is a kind of response observed in 15%–20% of severe head injury. Its pathophysiology is not well known yet, and its diagnosis is exclusively scanographic in emergency.

Objectives

To determine a particular difference between BS and the other kinds of severe brain injuries in their epidemiological, clinical, biological signs and evolutive result.

Material and methods

In the past 5 years, among 400 severe brain injured patients (gun shot excluded) with a Glasgow Coma Score ≤ 8.88 (22%) showed scanographic BS: no mass lesion and ventricles, cortical sulcal, basal cisterns effacement.

All patients were treated according to EBIC guidelines and epidemiological, clinical, biological, evolutive parameters were compared to these of the 312 other patients with standard traumatic lesions (STL).

Results

Whereas severity is the same in the two groups (GCS-STL = 5.07 ± 1.76/GCS-BS = 5.05 ± 1.43), three parameters, age, coagulation and evolution are different.

Age

BS is more frequent among young patients (STL = 40.31 ± 20.42 years, BS = 25.92 ± 10.14 years; P < 10–9). No patient > 50 years developed BS. Is the reason a higher brain compliance in young patients?

Coagulation

No biological sign is different in the two groups except coagulopathy (STL = 30/254, BS 16/58; P = 0.02). More generally, BS patients (haemorrhagic shock excluded) have an intravascular brain thromboplastin rush which seems to show that BS does not result from hyperhaemia only, but from mass commotion too (Table 1).

Evolution

After 6 months, BS patients seem to have a better Glasgow outcome scale in regards with baseline GCS (Table 2).

thumbnailFigure. In BS-GCS = 4-5, death and severe disability are leaded by associated primary brain stem lesion or secondary uniform herniation. In BS-GCS = 6-8, about 95% will get a social activity.

Have something to say? Post a comment on this article!


Published by
© 1999-2008 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated < info@ccforum.com >   Terms and conditions