|
Critical Care Volume 10 Issue 1 |
Viewing options:Associated material:Related literature:- Articles citing this article
- Other articles by authors
- Related articles/pages
Tools:Post to:
|
ResearchContinuous infusion of ceftazidime in critically ill patients undergoing continuous venovenous haemodiafiltration: pharmacokinetic evaluation and dose recommendationChristophe Mariat1 , Christophe Venet2 , François Jehl3 , Sandrine Mwewa4 , Vesna Lazarevic4 , Eric Diconne2 , Nathalie Fonsale5 , Anne Carricajo5 , Stéphane Guyomarc'h2 , Régine Vermesch2 , Gérald Aubert5 , Roselyne Bidault4 , Jean-Claude Bertrand2 and Fabrice Zeni2  1Service de Néphrologie, Hôpital Nord, CHU de Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France 2Service d'Urgences et de Réanimation, Hôpital Bellevue, CHU de Saint-Etienne, St Etienne, France 3Laboratoire de Bactériologie, Faculté de Médecine, Strasbourg, France 4Unité de Pharmacologie Clinique, Laboratoire Glaxo Wellcome, Marly Le Roi, France 5Service de Bactériologie, Hôpital Bellevue, CHU de Saint-Etienne, St Etienne France author email corresponding author email
Critical Care 2006,
10:R26doi:10.1186/cc3993
|
|
| Published: |
13 February 2006 |
Abstract
Introduction
In seriously infected patients with acute renal failure and who require continuous renal replacement therapy, data on continuous infusion of ceftazidime are lacking. Here we analyzed the pharmacokinetics of ceftazidime administered by continuous infusion in critically ill patients during continuous venovenous haemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) in order to identify the optimal dosage in this setting.
Method
Seven critically ill patients were prospectively enrolled in the study. CVVHDF was performed using a 0.6 m2 AN69 high-flux membrane and with blood, dialysate and ultrafiltration flow rates of 150 ml/min, 1 l/hour and 1.5 l/hour, respectively. Based on a predicted haemodiafiltration clearance of 32.5 ml/min, all patients received a 2 g loading dose of ceftazidime, followed by a 3 g/day continuous infusion for 72 hours. Serum samples were collected at 0, 3, 15 and 30 minutes and at 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours; dialysate/ultrafiltrate samples were taken at 2, 8, 12, 24, 36 and 48 hours. Ceftazidime concentrations in serum and dialysate/ultrafiltrate were measured using high-performance liquid chromatography.
Results
The mean (± standard deviation) elimination half-life, volume of distribution, area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to 72 hours, and total clearance of ceftazidime were 4 ± 1 hours, 19 ± 6 l, 2514 ± 212 mg/h per l, and 62 ± 5 ml/min, respectively. The mean serum ceftazidime steady-state concentration was 33.5 mg/l (range 28.8–36.3 mg/l). CVVHDF effectively removed continuously infused ceftazidime, with a sieving coefficient and haemodiafiltration clearance of 0.81 ± 0.11 and 33.6 ± 4 mg/l, respectively.
Conclusion
We conclude that a dosing regimen of 3 g/day ceftazidime, by continuous infusion, following a 2 g loading dose, results in serum concentrations more than four times the minimum inhibitory concentration for all susceptible pathogens, and we recommend this regimen in critically ill patients undergoing CVVHDF. |