Critical Care

official impact factor 4.60

Open Access Research

Lung and 'end organ' injury due to mechanical ventilation in animals: comparison between the prone and supine positions

George Nakos1*, Anna Batistatou2, Eftychia Galiatsou1, Eleonora Konstanti1, Vassilios Koulouras1, Panayotis Kanavaros3, Apostolos Doulis1, Athanassios Kitsakos1, Angeliki Karachaliou1, Marilena E Lekka4 and Maria Bai2

Author Affiliations

1 Department of Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital of Ioannina, Greece

2 Department of Pathology, University of Ioannina, Greece

3 Department of Anatomy-Histology-Embryology, University of Ioannina, Greece

4 Department of Chemistry, University of Ioannina, Greece

For all author emails, please log on.

Critical Care 2006, 10:R38 doi:10.1186/cc4840

Published: 28 February 2006

Abstract

Introduction

Use of the prone position in patients with acute lung injury improves their oxygenation. Most of these patients die from multisystem organ failure and not from hypoxia, however. Moreover, there is some evidence that the organ failure is caused by increased cell apoptosis. In the present study we therefore examined whether the position of the patients affects histological changes and apoptosis in the lung and 'end organs', including the brain, heart, diaphragm, liver, kidneys and small intestine.

Methods

Ten mechanically ventilated sheep with a tidal volume of 15 ml/kg body weight were studied for 90 minutes. Five sheep were placed in the supine position and five sheep were placed in the prone position during the experiment. Lung changes were analyzed histologically using a semiquantitative scoring system and the extent of apoptosis was investigated with the TUNEL method.

Results

In the supine position intra-alaveolar hemorrhage appeared predominantly in the dorsal areas, while the other histopathologic lesions were homogeneously distributed throughout the lungs. In the prone position, all histological changes were homogeneously distributed. A significantly higher score of lung injury was found in the supine position than in the prone position (4.63 ± 0.58 and 2.17 ± 0.19, respectively) (P < 0.0001). The histopathologic changes were accompanied by increased apoptosis (TUNEL method). In the supine position, the apoptotic index in the lung and in most of the 'end organs' was significantly higher compared with the prone position (all P < 0.005). Interestingly, the apoptotic index was higher in dorsal areas compared with ventral areas in both the prone and supine positions (P < 0.003 and P < 0.02, respectively).

Conclusion

Our results suggest that the prone position appears to reduce the severity and the extent of lung injury, and is associated with decreased apoptosis in the lung and 'end organs'.