Log on / register
BioMed Central home | Journals A-Z | Feedback | Support | My details
Commentary

Can you justify not using ultrasound guidance for central venous access?

Andrew R Bodenham email

Department of Anaesthesia, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, LS1 3EX, UK

author email corresponding author email

Critical Care 2006, 10:175doi:10.1186/cc5079

Published: 22 November 2006


See related research by Kavakitsos et al, http://ccforum.com/content/10/6/R162

Abstract

Karakitsos and coworkers, in this journal, reported further compelling evidence on the value of ultrasound in guiding internal jugular vein catheterization. In a large, prospective, randomized study of 900 patients, comparisons were made between patients in whom the procedure was performed using landmark-based techniques and those assigned to ultrasound guidance. The key benefits from use of ultrasound included reduction in needle puncture time, increased overall success rate (100% versus 94%), reduction in carotid puncture (1% versus 11%), reduction in carotid haematoma (0.4% versus 8.4%), reduction in haemothorax (0% versus 1.7%), decreased pneumothorax (0% versus 2.4%) and reduction in catheter-related infection (10% versus 16%). The implications of these findings are discussed, and a compelling case for routine use of ultrasound to guide central venous access is made.


© 1999-2009 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated. Part of Springer Science+Business Media.