|
| This article is part of the supplement: 26th International Symposium on Intensive Care and Emergency MedicinePoster presentationComputed tomography-based risk estimation on acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome after blunt thoracic traumaUniversity Hospital Leipzig, Germany Brussels, Belgium. 21–24 March 2006 Critical Care 2006, 10(Suppl 1):P10doi:10.1186/cc4357 The electronic version of this abstract is the complete one and can be found online at: http://ccforum.com/supplements/10/S1
ObjectiveComputed tomography (CT) is used in the diagnostic management of polytraumatized patients. Multiple trauma and pulmonary contusion are typical triggers of post-traumatic acute lung injury (ALI) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) [1]. Therefore, an early predictor of post-traumatic ALI/ARDS would be valuable. In this study we tested whether the mass of nonaerated lung tissue (Mnon) in admission CT could predict post-traumatic ALI/ARDS. MethodsThe Mnon of 54 polytraumatized patients with pulmonary contusion was analyzed as previously described [2]. We studied the association of Mnon with physiologic variables and injury descriptors such as PaO2/FiO2 ratio, injury severity score (ISS) and thoracic trauma severity score (TTSS) [3] recorded on admission. To evaluate Mnon as a predictor of ALI/ARDS we used a receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve. ResultsPatients developing post-traumatic ALI/ARDS had significantly larger Mnon and significantly higher ISS and TTSS values. Literature data suggest a higher incidence of ALI/ARDS with a contusioned lung volume >20% [4]. Our results, however, indicate a higher risk of ALI/ARDS already with a Mnon of around 10%. The Mnon predicting ALI/ARDS with the highest sensitivity (81%) and specificity (87%) was 9.8%. The area under the ROC curve was 0.89 (confidence interval 0.79–0.99). ConclusionThe mass of nonaerated lung tissue on admission CT can help to predict the development of ALI/ARDS. It may thereby help to implement appropriate therapeutic options such as lung protective ventilation. The clinical use of our technique, however, is limited by the time-consuming CT analysis. References
Have something to say? Post a comment on this article! |



on Google Scholar





