This article is part of the supplement: A reappraisal for the use of pulmonary artery catheters

Review

Evidence-based review of the use of the pulmonary artery catheter: impact data and complications

Mehrnaz Hadian and Michael R Pinsky^*

• * Corresponding author: Michael R Pinsky pinsky@pitt.edu

Author Affiliations

Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA

For all author emails, please log on.

Critical Care 2006, 10(Suppl 3):S8 doi:10.1186/cc4834

Published: 27 November 2006

Abstract

The pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) was introduced in 1971 for the assessment of heart function at the bedside. Since then it has generated much enthusiasm and controversy regarding the benefits and potential harms caused by this invasive form of hemodynamic monitoring. This review discusses all clinical studies conducted during the past 30 years, in intensive care unit settings or post mortem, on the impact of the PAC on outcomes and complications resulting from the procedure. Although most of the historical observational studies and randomized clinical trials also looked at PAC-related complications among their end-points, we opted to review the data under two main topics: the impact of PAC on clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness, and the major complications related to the use of the PAC.