Log on / register
BioMed Central home | Journals A-Z | Feedback | Support | My details
Commentary

Recombinant activated protein C in sepsis: endothelium protection or endothelium therapy?

Veronique Regnault1 and Bruno Levy2 email

1Inserm, U734; Coordination Circulation, Henri Poincare University, Nancy France

2Coordination Circulation UHP-INSERM, Contrat Avenir INSERM, Groupe CHOC, Faculté de Médecine. Université de Nancy-1, Nancy, France

author email corresponding author email

Critical Care 2006, 11:103doi:10.1186/cc5135

Published: 11 January 2007


See related review by Looney and Matthay, http://ccforum.com/content/10/6/239 and related letter by Li, http://ccforum.com/content/11/1/407

Abstract

Endothelium dysfunction is one of the hallmarks of sepsis. Looney and Mattay, in the previous issue of Critical Care, highlight the role of activated protein C (APC) as a protective endothelial drug in septic situations. Nevertheless, the results of in vivo studies are less explicit and it remains uncertain whether these properties are relevant in human septic shock. Before considering recombinant APC (rAPC) as a therapeutic drug for the endothelium, we have to demonstrate its efficiency to protect or to reduce endothelium injury when infused a long time after the septic challenge. Nevertheless, if rAPC is efficient when infused in the early phase of septic challenge, we thus need to treat our patients earlier. At the least, genetically engineered variants have been designed with greater anti-apoptotic activity and reduced anticoagulant activity relative to wild-type APC. Further studies are needed to demonstrate the usefulness of these variants in septic shock therapy.


© 1999-2009 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated. Part of Springer Science+Business Media.