Critical Care
Volume 11
Issue 1 |
Viewing options:Associated material:Related literature:- Articles citing this article
- Other articles by authors
- Related articles/pages
Tools:Post to:
|
This article is part of a series on End of life decision making, edited by
David Crippen.ReviewEthics review: Dark angels – the problem of death in intensive careDavid W Crippen1  and Leslie M Whetstine2 1Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 200 Lothrop Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15621, USA 2Duquesne University, Health care Ethics Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15282, USA  author email corresponding author email
Critical Care 2007,
11:202doi:10.1186/cc5138
|
|
| Published: |
17 January 2007 |
Abstract
Critical care medicine has expanded the envelope of debilitating disease through the application of an aggressive and invasive care plan, part of which is designed to identify and reverse organ dysfunction before it proceeds to organ failure. For a select patient population, this care plan has been remarkably successful. But because patient selection is very broad, critical care sometimes yields amalgams of life in death: the state of being unable to participate in human life, unable to die, at least in the traditional sense. This work examines the emerging paradox of somatic versus brain death and why it matters to medical science. | 
on Google Scholar
