Critical Care
Volume 11
Issue 2 |
Viewing options:Associated material:Related literature:- Articles citing this article
- Other articles by authors
- Related articles/pages
Tools:Post to:
|
This article is part of a series on End of life decision making, edited by David Crippen.CommentaryDo-not-resuscitate orders, unintended consequences, and the ripple effectJ Claude Hemphill III  Department of Neurology, Room 4M62, San Francisco General Hospital, 1001 Potrero Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94110, USA  author email corresponding author email
Critical Care 2007,
11:121doi:10.1186/cc5687 Abstract
Do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders are commonly implemented in the critical care setting as a prelude to end-of-life care. This is often based on presumed prognosis for favorable outcome and interpretation of patient, family, and even physician wishes. While DNR orders explicitly apply only to an individual patient, the hospital culture and milieu in which DNR orders are implemented could potentially have an overall impact on aggressiveness of care across patients. As illustrated by the example of intracerebral hemorrhage, this may unexpectedly influence outcome even in patients without DNR orders in place. | 
on Google Scholar
