Log on / register
BioMed Central home | Journals A-Z | Feedback | Support

This article is part of a series on Disaster Management, edited by J. Christopher Farmer.

Review

Clinical review: Mass casualty triage – pandemic influenza and critical care

Kirsty Challen email, Andrew Bentley, John Bright and Darren Walter

University Hospital of South Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK

author email corresponding author email

Critical Care 2007, 11:212doi:10.1186/cc5732

Published: 30 April 2007

Abstract

Worst case scenarios for pandemic influenza planning in the US involve over 700,000 patients requiring mechanical ventilation. UK planning predicts a 231% occupancy of current level 3 (intensive care unit) bed capacity. Critical care planners need to recognise that mortality is likely to be high and the risk to healthcare workers significant. Contingency planning should, therefore, be multi-faceted, involving a robust health command structure, the facility to expand critical care provision in terms of space, equipment and staff and cohorting of affected patients in the early stages. It should also be recognised that despite this expansion of critical care, demand will exceed supply and a process for triage needs to be developed that is valid, reproducible, transparent and consistent with distributive justice. We advocate the development and validation of physiological scores for use as a triage tool, coupled with candid public discussion of the process.


© 1999-2008 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated < info@ccforum.com >   Terms and conditions