Table 3

Multivariable logistic regression analysis of decannulation factors

Factors

Odds ratio (95% CI)a

P valuea


Clinician factors

Principal work facility

Acute careb

1.00

Weaning

0.79 (0.45, 1.40)

0.424

Rehabilitation

0.52 (0.26, 1.04)

0.063

Chronic care

0.28 (0.10, 0.77)

0.014

Patient scenario characteristics

Level of consciousness, alert versus drowsyb

4.76 (3.27, 6.90)

<0.001

Cough effectiveness, strong versus weakb

3.84 (2.66, 5.54)

<0.001

Secretions, scant thin versus moderate thickb

2.23 (1.56, 3.19)

<0.001

Oxygenation, 95% saturation, FiO2 of 0.30 versus FiO2 of 0.50b

2.04 (1.45, 2.86)

<0.001


aOdds ratios with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and P values were calculated by multivariable logistic regression analysis using robust estimates of variance and are for the comparison of clinical scenarios in which decannulation was recommended with those in which it was not. Odds ratios of greater than 1.0 favor clinician recommendation for tracheostomy decannulation. Odds ratios of less than 1.0 favor clinician recommendation against tracheostomy decannulation. bClinical scenarios with this factor served as the reference group. FiO2, fraction of inspired oxygen.

Stelfox et al. Critical Care 2008 12:R26   doi:10.1186/cc6802

Open Data