Log on / register
BioMed Central home | Journals A-Z | Feedback | Support | My details
Commentary

Tracheostomy decannulation: marathons and finish lines

John E Heffner1,2 email

Providence Portland Medical Center, NE Hoyt St, Portland, Oregon, 97213 USA

Oregon Health & Science University, SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, Oregon 97239, USA

author email corresponding author email

Critical Care 2008, 12:128doi:10.1186/cc6833

Published: 31 March 2008


See related research by Stelfox et al., http://ccforum.com/content/12/2/R26

Abstract

Critically ill patients with a tracheostomy who are recovering from respiratory failure eventually require evaluation for airway decannulation. Although expert recommendations guide decisions for managing decannulation, few if any investigative data exist to inform evidence-based care. Consequently, practice variation limits the effectiveness of weaning from tracheostomy. In an investigation reported in this issue of Critical Care, the authors surveyed experienced physicians and respiratory therapists to assess their opinions on managing airway decannulation and identified several clinical factors that they recommend for selecting patients for tracheostomy tube removal. The authors propose that these factors can assist with designing clinical trials of tracheostomy decannulation. Pending completion of such studies, this report underscores the problem of practice variation in managing tracheotomized patients after critical illness. An important implication of the study is that care providers should recognize our knowledge deficit and develop systematic protocols for improving patient care using quality improvement techniques. Such models exist in the literature for adult patients and for children with tracheostomies who are managed by expert teams with requisite knowledge and skills.


© 1999-2010 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated. Part of Springer Science+Business Media.