Relaunching the Pro–Con section at Critical Care
-
Correspondence: Thomas E Stewart tstewart@mtsinai.on.ca
Professor of Medicine and Anaesthesia, University of Toronto, Director of Critical Care Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital and University Health Network (TGH, TWH and PMH), 600 University Avenue, Suite 18-206, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 1X5
Critical Care 2008, 12:140 doi:10.1186/cc6867
Published: 25 April 2008First paragraph (this article has no abstract)
At a recent Editorial Board meeting of Critical Care that was held in conjunction with the International Symposium of Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine in Brussels, there was a fairly lively discussion about the Pro–Con section of the journal. Despite data demonstrating that the diverse and provocative Pro–Con debates published over the years have been popular, there was a sense they could offer more to our readership. As a result we decided to embark on a makeover for the section that finds its beginnings in the present edition of Critical Care.