Critical Care
Volume 12
Issue 2 |
Viewing options:Associated material:Related literature:- Articles citing this article
- Other articles by authors
- Related articles/pages
Tools:Post to:
|
 CommentarySteroids in sepsis: another swing of the pendulum in our clinical trialsJean-Louis Vincent  Department of Intensive Care, Université libre de Bruxelles, Erasme Hospital, route de Lennik 808, 1070 Brussels, Belgium  author email corresponding author email
Critical Care 2008,
12:141doi:10.1186/cc6861 See related letter by Bauer et al., http://ccforum.com/content/12/4/426 Abstract
Many studies have been conducted to try and find interventions to treat patients with severe sepsis, but with little success. In several cases, initial apparent beneficial effects have not been confirmed in later trials. The story of steroids in sepsis is one example of this pendulum effect, with initial success in the study by Annane et al. tempered by the more recent negative results of the Corticus study. The reasons for this pendulum effect are likely related, at least in part, to issues of clinical trial design and the way in which clinical trials in intensive care unit patients are developed, conducted and assessed needs to be critically reassessed. | 
on Google Scholar
