Critical Care

official impact factor 4.60

Open Access Highly Access Research

Small-volume resuscitation with hyperoncotic albumin: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials

Matthias Jacob1*, Daniel Chappell1, Peter Conzen1, Mahlon M Wilkes2, Bernhard F Becker3 and Markus Rehm1

Author Affiliations

1 Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Klinikum Grosshadern, Nussbaumstrasse 20, D-80336 Munich, Germany

2 Hygeia Associates, 17988 Brewer Road, Grass Valley, California 95949, USA

3 Physiologisches Institut – Vegetative Physiologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Schillerstrasse 44, D-80336 Munich, Germany

For all author emails, please log on.

Critical Care 2008, 12:R34 doi:10.1186/cc6812

Published: 4 March 2008

Abstract

Background

Small-volume resuscitation can rapidly correct hypovolemia. Hyperoncotic albumin solutions, long in clinical use, are suitable for small-volume resuscitation; however, their clinical benefits remain uncertain.

Methods

Randomized clinical trials comparing hyperoncotic albumin with a control regimen for volume expansion were sought by multiple methods, including computer searches of bibliographic databases, perusal of reference lists, and manual searching. Major findings were qualitatively summarized. In addition, a quantitative meta-analysis was performed on available survival data.

Results

In all, 25 randomized clinical trials with a total of 1,485 patients were included. In surgery, hyperoncotic albumin preserved renal function and reduced intestinal edema compared with control fluids. In trauma and sepsis, cardiac index and oxygenation were higher after administration of hydroxyethyl starch than hyperoncotic albumin. Improved treatment response and renal function, shorter hospital stay and lower costs of care were reported in patients with liver disease receiving hyperoncotic albumin. Edema and morbidity were decreased in high-risk neonates after hyperoncotic albumin administration. Disability was reduced by therapy with hyperoncotic albumin in brain injury. There was no evidence of deleterious effects attributable to hyperoncotic albumin. Survival was unaffected by hyperoncotic albumin (pooled relative risk, 0.95; 95% confidence interval 0.78 to 1.17).

Conclusion

In some clinical indications, randomized trial evidence has suggested certain benefits of hyperoncotic albumin such as reductions in morbidity, renal impairment and edema. However, further clinical trials are needed, particularly in surgery, trauma and sepsis.