Log on / register
BioMed Central home | Journals A-Z | Feedback | Support

This article is part of a series on Disaster Management, edited by J. Christopher Farmer.

Review

Clinical review: The role of the intensive care physician in mass casualty incidents: planning, organisation, and leadership

Peter J Shirley email and Gerlinde Mandersloot

Royal London Hospital, Whitechapel, London, E1 1BB, UK

author email corresponding author email

Critical Care 2008, 12:214doi:10.1186/cc6876

Published: 14 May 2008

Abstract

There is a long-standing, broad assumption that hospitals will ably receive and efficiently provide comprehensive care to victims following a mass casualty event. Unfortunately, the majority of medical major incident plans are insufficiently focused on strategies and procedures that extend beyond the pre-hospital and early-hospital phases of care. Recent events underscore two important lessons: (a) the role of intensive care specialists extends well beyond the intensive care unit during such events, and (b) non-intensive care hospital personnel must have the ability to provide basic critical care. The bombing of the London transport network, while highlighting some good practices in our major incident planning, also exposed weaknesses already described by others. Whilst this paper uses the events of the 7 July 2005 as its point of reference, the lessons learned and the changes incorporated in our planning have generic applications to mass casualty events. In the UK, the Department of Health convened an expert symposium in June 2007 to identify lessons learned from 7 July 2005 and disseminate them for the benefit of the wider medical community. The experiences of clinicians from critical care units in London made a large contribution to this process and are discussed in this paper.


© 1999-2008 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated < info@ccforum.com >   Terms and conditions