Log on / register
BioMed Central home | Journals A-Z | Feedback | Support | My details
Highly AccessReview

Pro/Con debate: Should 24/7 in-house intensivist coverage be implemented?

Yaseen Arabi email

Intensive Care Department, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, King Abdulaziz Medical City, ICU 1425, PO Box 22490, Riyadh, 11426 K.S.A

author email corresponding author email

Critical Care 2008, 12:216doi:10.1186/cc6905

Published: 5 June 2008

Abstract

You are appointed director of a new large multi-discipline intensive care unit in an academic center. The hospital is affiliated with a medical school and as such there will be an adequate number of medical students, residents, and fellows (specializing in critical care) rotating through the unit. The unit will be a 'closed' (intensivist-led) model. In setting up the call schedule for the intensivists, you need to decide whether the mandate will be for the intensivists to provide 24/7 in-house coverage as opposed to off-hour coverage from home. You wonder about the sustainability of each model.


© 1999-2008 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated. Part of Springer Science+Business Media.