Antimicrobial treatment for ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis: a randomized, controlled, multicenter study1Réanimation Médicale, boulevard du Pr Leclercq, Hôpital Calmette, CHRU de Lille, 59037 Lille Cedex, France 2Laboratoire d'Evaluation Médicale, EA 2690, Université Lille II, 1 place de Verdun, 59045 Lille, France 3Centre d'Investigation Clinique, boulevard du Pr Leclercq Hôpital Cardiologique, CHRU de Lille, 59037 Lille Cedex, France 4Réanimation Neurochirurgicale, CHRU de Lille, Hôpital R. Salengro, CHRU de Lille, 59037 Lille Cedex, France 5Réanimation Polyvalente, Hôpital Régional, Avenue Désandrouin, BP 479, 59322 Valenciennes Cedex, France 6Réanimation Polyvalente, CH Duchenne, rue Jacques Monod, BP 609, 62321 Boulogne Sur Mer, France
Critical Care 2008, 12:R62doi:10.1186/cc6890
See related commentary by Craven, http://ccforum.com/content/12/3/157 AbstractIntroductionVentilator-associated tracheobronchitis (VAT) is associated with increased duration of mechanical ventilation. We hypothesized that, in patients with VAT, antibiotic treatment would be associated with reduced duration of mechanical ventilation. MethodsWe conducted a prospective, randomized, controlled, unblinded, multicenter study. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive or not receive intravenous antibiotics for 8 days. Patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) prior to VAT and those with severe immunosuppression were not eligible. The trial was stopped early because a planned interim analysis found a significant difference in intensive care unit (ICU) mortality. ResultsFifty-eight patients were randomly assigned. Patient characteristics were similar in the antibiotic (n = 22) and no antibiotic (n = 36) groups. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was identified in 32% of VAT episodes. Although no difference was found in mechanical ventilation duration and length of ICU stay, mechanical ventilation-free days were significantly higher (median [interquartile range], 12 [8 to 24] versus 2 [0 to 6] days, P < 0.001) in the antibiotic group than in the no antibiotic group. In addition, subsequent VAP (13% versus 47%, P = 0.011, odds ratio [OR] 0.17, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.04 to 0.70) and ICU mortality (18% versus 47%, P = 0.047, OR 0.24, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.88) rates were significantly lower in the antibiotic group than in the no antibiotic group. Similar results were found after exclusion of patients with do-not-resuscitate orders and those randomly assigned to the no antibiotic group but who received antibiotics for infections other than VAT or subsequent VAP. ConclusionIn patients with VAT, antimicrobial treatment is associated with a greater number of days free of mechanical ventilation and lower rates of VAP and ICU mortality. However, antibiotic treatment has no significant impact on total duration of mechanical ventilation. Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00122057. |



on Google Scholar







author email
corresponding author email