|
Prediction of stroke volume responsiveness |
|||||
| Baseline haemodynamic indices |
ROC curves: predicting ΔSV > 25% |
Pearson's correlation: baseline haemodynamic indices versus ΔSV |
|||
|
|
|||||
| AUC |
95% CI |
Pa |
r2 |
P |
|
|
|
|||||
| SVVFloTrac |
0.824 |
0.680 to 0.967 |
<0.001 |
0.426 |
<0.001 |
| SVVPiCCO |
0.858 |
0.745 to 0.971 |
<0.001 |
0.492 |
<0.001 |
| PPV |
0.718 |
0.578 to 0.898 |
0.011 |
0.334 |
<0.001 |
| GEDV |
0.509 |
0.323 to 0.695 |
0.632 |
0.061 |
0.580 |
| CVP |
0.299 |
0.134 to 0.465 |
0.924 |
0.010 |
0.730 |
|
aComparison with AUC = 0.5. AUC, area under the ROC curve; CI, confidence interval; CVP, central venous pressure; GEDV, global end-diastolic volume; PPV, pulse pressure variation; r2, Pearson correlation coefficient; ROC, receiver operating characteristic; ΔSV, % change in stroke volume; SVV, stroke volume variation. | |||||
Hofer et al. Critical Care 2008 12:R82 doi:10.1186/cc6933 |
|||||