Table 2 |
||||
|
Bland–Altman analysis and linear regression analysis of changes in cardiac output |
||||
|
Bias (%) |
Precision (%) |
95% limits of agreement (%) |
r2 |
|
|
|
||||
|
ΔCOTCP and ΔPulseCO |
12 |
19 |
-26 to 50 |
0.38 |
|
ΔCOTCP and ΔPCCOpre |
14 |
18 |
-22 to 51 |
0.32 |
|
ΔCOTCP and ΔPCCOrecal |
-1 |
5 |
-10 to 9 |
0.94 |
|
ΔCOTCP and ΔCCOPAC |
2 |
14 |
-26 to 30 |
0.47 |
|
|
||||
|
Bias (mean difference), precision (standard deviation of bias), 95% limits of agreement, and correlation coefficient (r2) between changes (Δ) of CO measured by ΔPulseCO, ΔPCCOpre, ΔPCCOrecal and ΔCCOPAC compared with ΔCOTCP. COTCP, bolus transcardiopulmonary thermodilution cardiac output; PulseCO, continuous cardiac output by pulse power analysis; PCCOpre, continuous cardiac output by pulse contour analysis before calibration; PCCOrecal, continuous cardiac output by pulse contour analysis after recalibration; CCOPAC, continuous cardiac output by pulmonary artery catheter thermodilution. |
||||
|
Gruenewald et al. Critical Care 2008 12:R132 doi:10.1186/cc7102 |
||||