Log on / register
BioMed Central home | Journals A-Z | Feedback | Support | My details
Open AccessHighly AccessResearch

Performance of N-terminal-pro-B-type natriuretic peptide in critically ill patients: a prospective observational cohort study

Isaline Coquet1,2 email, Michael Darmon1 email, Jean-Marc Doise2 email, Michel Degrès3 email, Bernard Blettery2 email, Benoît Schlemmer1,4 email, Philippe Gambert3 email and Jean-Pierre Quenot2 email

1Medical Intensive Care Unit, Saint-Louis University Hospital, AP-HP, 1 Avenue Claude Vellefaux, Paris, 75010, France

2Medical Intensive Care Unit, Dijon University Hospital, 1 boulevard Jeanne d'Arc, Dijon, 21079 Dijon cedex, France

3Biochemistry Laboratory, Dijon University Hospital, 1 boulevard Jeanne d'Arc, Dijon, 21079 Dijon cedex, France

4Université Paris-7 Paris-Diderot, UFR de Médecine, 75010 Paris, France

author email corresponding author email

Critical Care 2008, 12:R137doi:10.1186/cc7110

Published: 6 November 2008


See related commentary by Collinson, http://ccforum.com/content/13/1/105

Abstract

Introduction

The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of N-terminal-pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) as a diagnostic tool to recognize acute respiratory failure of cardiac origin in an unselected cohort of critically ill patients.

Methods

We conducted a prospective observational study of medical ICU patients. NT-proBNP was measured at ICU admission, and diagnosis of cardiac dysfunction relied on the patient's clinical presentation and echocardiography.

Results

Of the 198 patients included in this study, 102 (51.5%) had evidence of cardiac dysfunction. Median NT-proBNP concentrations were 5,720 ng/L (1,430 to 15,698) and 854 ng/L (190 to 3,560) in patients with and without cardiac dysfunction, respectively (P < 0.0001). In addition, NT-proBNP concentrations were correlated with age (ρ = 0.43, P < 0.0001) and inversely correlated with creatinine clearance (ρ = -0.58, P < 0.0001). When evaluating the performance of NT-proBNP concentrations to detect cardiac dysfunction, the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.76 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.69 to 0.83). In addition, a stepwise logistic regression model revealed that NT-proBNP (odds ratio (OR) = 1.01 per 100 ng/L, 95% CI 1.002 to 1.02), electrocardiogram modifications (OR = 11.03, 95% CI 5.19 to 23.41), and severity assessed by organ system failure score (OR = 1.63 per point, 95% CI 1.17 to 2.41) adequately predicted cardiac dysfunction. The area under the ROC curve of this model was 0.83 (95% CI 0.77 to 0.90).

Conclusions

NT-proBNP measured at ICU admission might represent a useful marker to exclude cardiac dysfunction in critically ill patients.


© 1999-2009 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated. Part of Springer Science+Business Media.