Critical Care

official impact factor 4.60

This article is part of the supplement: 28th International Symposium on Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine

Poster presentation

Clinical evaluation of a system for measuring functional residual capacity in mechanically ventilated patients

L Brewer, B Markewitz, E Fulcher and J Orr

Author Affiliations

University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

For all author emails, please log on.

Critical Care 2008, 12(Suppl 2):P313 doi:10.1186/cc6534


The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://ccforum.com/content/12/S2/P313


Published:13 March 2008

© 2008 BioMed Central Ltd

Introduction

The ability to track the functional residual capacity (FRC) volume for a patient treated with ventilator therapy may be useful for guidance in improving or preserving gas exchange and for avoiding ventilator-associated injury to the lung. We tested the repeatability of the FRC measurement at the bedside for mechanically ventilated patients in the ICU.

Methods

All data needed for the FRC measurement were collected using a volumetric capnography system (NICO2; Respironics, Wallingford, CT, USA), which had been modified to contain a fast, on-airway oxygen sensor. The nitrogen washout and washin method was used to calculate the FRC for 13 ICU patients. The protocol for a measurement set called for increasing the FIO2 from the clinically determined baseline to 100% for 5 minutes, returning the FIO2 to the baseline level for 5 minutes, and then repeating the FIO2 change. After approximately 1 hour, the measurement set was repeated. The differences between the first and second measurements in each set were analyzed.

Results

Bland–Altman analysis yielded a bias between repeated measurements of 85 ml (2.8%) and a standard deviation of the differences of ± 278 ml (9.0%). The r2 of the repeated measurements was 0.92 (n = 28). See Figure 1.

Conclusion

We have previously verified the FRC measurement accuracy of this system in bench tests and volunteer studies. The satisfactory repeatability demonstrated in this study suggests the system is clinically viable in the ICU.