|
| This article is part of the supplement: 28th International Symposium on Intensive Care and Emergency MedicinePoster presentationVenous return in ICU patients1Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. 2University of Pittsburgh, PA, USA. Brussels, Belgium. 18–21 March 2008 Critical Care 2008, 12(Suppl 2):P93doi:10.1186/cc6314 The electronic version of this abstract is the complete one and can be found online at: http://ccforum.com/content/12/S2/P93
©
2008 BioMed Central Ltd IntroductionGuyton's theory on venous return, implying a linear relationship between blood flow and central venous pressure, was tested in 12 mechanically ventilated ICU patients during standard care. MethodsThe central venous pressure was changed by applying four different constant inspiratory plateau pressures over 12 seconds. Mean values of central venous pressure and cardiac output were measured with pulse contour analysis over the last 3 seconds of this plateau period and were plotted against each other to construct a venous return curve. During the inspiratory plateau periods, hemodynamic steady-state circumstances were met without an observable change in cardiovascular control mechanisms. Two different volemic states were created: normovolemia in the supine position (SUP) and hypervolemia by volume loading with 0.5 l intravenously (SUP-V). ResultsGuyton's linear venous return pressure–flow relationship was confirmed. The average slope of the relation during SUP was not significantly different from the slope during SUP-V. The mean systemic filling pressures derived from these venous return curves during SUP and SUP-V were 18.8 ± 4.5 mmHg and 29.1 ± 5.2 mmHg, respectively (P < 0.001). During SUP the calculated total circulatory mean compliance was 0.98 ml/mmHg/kg and the mean stressed volume was 1,677 ml. ConclusionThe mean systemic filling pressure, systemic compliance and stressed volume can be determined in mechanically ventilated patients with intact circulation using inspiratory pause procedures. These results may imply a physiological tool to assess the volume state of the circulation as well as fluid responsiveness of mechanically ventilated patients in the ICU. Have something to say? Post a comment on this article! |



on Google Scholar





