Critical Care

official impact factor 4.60

Bench-to-bedside review: The importance of the precision of the reference technique in method comparison studies – with specific reference to the measurement of cardiac output

Maurizio Cecconi*, Andrew Rhodes, Jan Poloniecki, Giorgio Della Rocca and R Michael Grounds

Critical Care 2009, 13:201 doi:10.1186/cc7129

Accesses  

  • Last 30 days: 42 accesses
  • Last year: 693 accesses
  • All time: 2607 accesses

Cited by

BioMed Central: 6 citations

Commentary   Subscription Highly Accessed

Transpulmonary thermodilution assessments: precise measurements require a precise procedure

Raphaƫl Giraud, Nils Siegenthaler, Karim Bendjelid Critical Care 2011, 15:195 (12 October 2011)

Research   Open Access Highly Accessed

Precision of the transpulmonary thermodilution measurements

Xavier Monnet, Romain Persichini, Mariem Ktari, Mathieu Jozwiak, Christian Richard, Jean-Louis Teboul Critical Care 2011, 15:R204 (27 August 2011)

Commentary   Free

Pulse pressure analysis: to make a long story short

Maurizio Cecconi, Andrew Rhodes Critical Care 2010, 14:175 (12 July 2010)

Research   Open Access Highly Accessed

Arterial pressure-based cardiac output in septic patients: different accuracy of pulse contour and uncalibrated pressure waveform devices

Xavier Monnet, Nadia Anguel, Brice Naudin, Julien Jabot, Christian Richard, Jean-Louis Teboul Critical Care 2010, 14:R109 (10 June 2010)

Research   Open Access Highly Accessed

Comparison of monitoring performance of Bioreactance vs. pulse contour during lung recruitment maneuvers

Pierre Squara, Dominique Rotcajg, Dominique Denjean, Philippe Estagnasie, Alain Brusset Critical Care 2009, 13:R125 (28 July 2009)

Commentary   Free

Validation of continuous cardiac output technologies: consensus still awaited

Maurizio Cecconi, Andrew Rhodes Critical Care 2009, 13:159 (26 June 2009)