Research

Automatic versus manual pressure support reduction in the weaning of post-operative patients: a randomised controlled trial

Corinne Taniguchi¹ , Raquel C Eid¹ , Cilene Saghabi¹ , Rogério Souza² , Eliezer Silva¹ , Elias Knobel¹ , Ângela T Paes¹ and Carmen S Barbas^1,2

¹Adult – ICU – Albert Einstein Hospital, Av. Albert Einstein 627-5 andar – São Paulo, SP, 05651-901, Brazil

²Pulmonary Division, University of São Paulo, Av Dr Eneas de Carvalho Aguiar 255-room 7079, São Paulo, SP, 05403-900, Brazil

author email corresponding author email

Critical Care 2009, 13:R6doi:10.1186/cc7695

Published:	26 January 2009

See related commentary by Adiguzel et al., http://ccforum.com/content/13/3/142 and related letter by Cakar, http://ccforum.com/content/13/4/415

Abstract

Introduction

Reduction of automatic pressure support based on a target respiratory frequency or mandatory rate ventilation (MRV) is available in the Taema-Horus ventilator for the weaning process in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting. We hypothesised that MRV is as effective as manual weaning in post-operative ICU patients.

Methods

There were 106 patients selected in the post-operative period in a prospective, randomised, controlled protocol. When the patients arrived at the ICU after surgery, they were randomly assigned to either: traditional weaning, consisting of the manual reduction of pressure support every 30 minutes, keeping the respiratory rate/tidal volume (RR/TV) below 80 L until 5 to 7 cmH₂O of pressure support ventilation (PSV); or automatic weaning, referring to MRV set with a respiratory frequency target of 15 breaths per minute (the ventilator automatically decreased the PSV level by 1 cmH₂O every four respiratory cycles, if the patient's RR was less than 15 per minute). The primary endpoint of the study was the duration of the weaning process. Secondary endpoints were levels of pressure support, RR, TV (mL), RR/TV, positive end expiratory pressure levels, FiO₂ and SpO₂ required during the weaning process, the need for reintubation and the need for non-invasive ventilation in the 48 hours after extubation.

Results

In the intention to treat analysis there were no statistically significant differences between the 53 patients selected for each group regarding gender (p = 0.541), age (p = 0.585) and type of surgery (p = 0.172). Nineteen patients presented complications during the trial (4 in the PSV manual group and 15 in the MRV automatic group, p < 0.05). Nine patients in the automatic group did not adapt to the MRV mode. The mean ± sd (standard deviation) duration of the weaning process was 221 ± 192 for the manual group, and 271 ± 369 minutes for the automatic group (p = 0.375). PSV levels were significantly higher in MRV compared with that of the PSV manual reduction (p < 0.05). Reintubation was not required in either group. Non-invasive ventilation was necessary for two patients, in the manual group after cardiac surgery (p = 0.51).

Conclusions

The duration of the automatic reduction of pressure support was similar to the manual one in the post-operative period in the ICU, but presented more complications, especially no adaptation to the MRV algorithm.

Trial Registration

Trial registration number: ISRCTN37456640