Table 1 |
|||||||
|
Glycemia and mortality in three randomized controlled trials to assess the benefit of intensive insulin therapy |
|||||||
|
Glycemic control, mmol/La |
Insulin protocol application |
Mortality |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Conventional |
IIT |
Conventional |
IIT |
Conventional |
IIT |
P value |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Leuven I trial [7] |
8.5 ± 1.8 |
5.7 ± 1.1 |
307/783 (39.2%) |
755/765 (98.7%) |
63/783 (8.0%) |
35/765 (4.6%) |
<0.04 |
|
Leuven II trial [8] |
8.5 ± 1.7 |
6.2 ± 1.6 |
426/605 <0.04 |
580/595 (98%) |
162/605 (26.8%) |
144/595 (24.2%) |
0.31 |
|
VISEP study [13] |
8.4 ± 1.8 |
6.2 ± 1.0 |
215/290 (74.1%) |
243/247 (98.4%) |
75/289 (26.0%) |
61/247 (24.7%) |
0.74 |
|
|
|||||||
|
aGlycemic control values are presented as mean ± standard deviation. IIT, intensive insulin therapy; VISEP, Efficacy of Volume Substitution and Insulin Therapy in Severe Sepsis. |
|||||||
|
Egi et al. Critical Care 2009 13:302 doi:10.1186/cc7755 |
|||||||