Log on / register
BioMed Central home | Journals A-Z | Feedback | Support | My details
Commentary

Detecting volume responsiveness and unresponsiveness in intensive care unit patients: two different problems, only one solution

Jean-Louis Teboul1,2 email and Xavier Monnet1,2 email

Service de réanimation médicale, CHU Bicêtre, AP-HP, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, F-94270, France

EA 4046, faculté de médecine Paris-Sud, Univ Paris-Sud, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, F-94270, France

author email corresponding author email

Critical Care 2009, 13:175doi:10.1186/cc7979

Published: 10 August 2009


See related research by Thiel et al., http://ccforum.com/content/13/4/R111

Abstract

Policies of fluid administration/restriction in critically ill patients have evolved over recent years. Abundant fluid resuscitation is encouraged during the early stage of severe sepsis. But a conservative fluid strategy is recommended in later stages, in particular when lungs are injured. Both strategies are risky if uncontrolled. Tests detecting volume unresponsiveness at any moment of fluid resuscitation or detecting volume unresponsiveness at any moment of fluid restriction would help to better assess the benefit/risk ratio of continuing such strategies. Measuring the short-term hemodynamic changes during passive leg raising can be reliably used for that purpose in both situations, even when patients are breathing spontaneously.


© 1999-2010 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated. Part of Springer Science+Business Media.