Critical Care Volume 13 Issue 4 |
Viewing options:Associated material:Related literature:- Articles citing this article
- Other articles by authors
- Related articles/pages
Tools: Post to:
|
 ResearchImplementation of a delirium assessment tool in the ICU can influence haloperidol useMark van den Boogaard1 , Peter Pickkers1 , Hans van der Hoeven1 , Gabriel Roodbol2 , Theo van Achterberg3 and Lisette Schoonhoven3  1Department of Intensive care medicine, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre P.O. box 9101, Internal post 685, Nijmegen, 6500HB, The Netherlands 2Department of Psychiatry, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, P.O. box 9101, Internal post 963, Nijmegen, 6500HB, The Netherlands 3Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein noord 21, Internal post 114, Nijmegen, 6525 EZ, The Netherlands author email corresponding author email
Critical Care 2009,
13:R131doi:10.1186/cc7991
|
|
| Published: |
10 August 2009 |
Abstract
Introduction
In critically ill patients, delirium is a serious and frequent disorder that is associated with a prolonged intensive care and hospital stay and an increased morbidity and mortality. Without the use of a delirium screening instrument, delirium is often missed by ICU nurses and physicians. The effects of implementation of a screening method on haloperidol use is not known. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the implementation of the confusion assessment method-ICU (CAM-ICU) and the effect of its use on frequency and duration of haloperidol use.
Methods
We used a tailored implementation strategy focused on potential barriers. We measured CAM-ICU compliance, interrater reliability, and delirium knowledge, and compared the haloperidol use, as a proxy for delirium incidence, before and after the implementation of the CAM-ICU.
Results
Compliance and delirium knowledge increased from 77% to 92% and from 6.2 to 7.4, respectively (both, P < 0.0001). The interrater reliability increased from 0.78 to 0.89. More patients were treated with haloperidol (9.9% to 14.8%, P < 0.001), however with a lower dose (18 to 6 mg, P = 0.01) and for a shorter time period (5 [IQR:2–9] to 3 [IQR:1–5] days, P = 0.02).
Conclusions
With a tailored implementation strategy, a delirium assessment tool was successfully introduced in the ICU with the main goals achieved within four months. Early detection of delirium in critically ill patients increases the number of patients that receive treatment with haloperidol, however with a lower dose and for a shorter time period. |