Critical Care

official impact factor 4.60

Commentary

The evolving story of medical emergency teams in quality improvement

André CKB Amaral1* and Kaveh G Shojania2

Author Affiliations

1 Department of Critical Care Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Room D108, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada

2 Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto Centre for Patient Safety, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Room H468, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada

For all author emails, please log on.

Critical Care 2009, 13:194 doi:10.1186/cc8033

Published: 12 October 2009

Abstract

Adverse events affect approximately 3% to 12% of hospitalized patients. At least a third, but as many as half, of such events are considered preventable. Detection of these events requires investments of time and money. A report in a recent issue of Critical Care used the medical emergency team activation as a trigger to perform a prospective standardized evaluation of charts. The authors observed that roughly one fourth of calls were related to a preventable adverse event, which is comparable to the previous literature. However, while previous studies relied on retrospective chart reviews, this study introduced the novel element of real-time characterization of events by the team at the moment of consultation. This methodology captures important opportunities for improvements in local care at a rate far higher than routine incident-reporting systems, but without requiring substantial investments of additional resources. Academic centers are increasingly recognizing engagement in quality improvement as a distinct career pathway. Involving such physicians in medical emergency teams will likely facilitate the dual roles of these as a clinical outreach arm of the intensive care unit and in identifying problems in care and leading to strategies to reduce them.