Critical Care

official impact factor 4.60

This article is part of the supplement: 29th International Symposium on Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine

Poster presentation

Impact of a simple computer alert on the quality of tight glycemic control

E V Stichele, W De Becker, P Wouters, D Cottem, G V Berghe and G Meyfroidt

Author Affiliations

UZ Leuven, Belgium

For all author emails, please log on.

Critical Care 2009, 13(Suppl 1):P123 doi:10.1186/cc7287


The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://ccforum.com/content/13/S1/P123


Published:13 March 2009

© 2009 Stichele et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Introduction

Tight glycemic control (TGC) in the ICU is difficult, and is associated with an increased risk of hypoglycemia [1]. We use a nurse-wise insulin titration protocol for TGC in our ICU. The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of a simple computer alert on the quality of TGC.

Methods

An alert was created with the EventManager® of MetaVision®. The nurses received a pop-up message on the bedside workstation, with a simple suggestion for the timing of the next measurement and a nonspecific instruction to check caloric intake and insulin dose, at the following blood glucose (BG) thresholds: BG >180 mg/dl, >110 mg/dl, <80 mg/dl, <60 mg/dl. When BG was <40 mg/dl, an alert was sent to all workstations, and to both doctors and nurses. The alert was implemented on 1 August 2007. We performed an observational cohort study, including all adults (>18 years) who were in our ICU between 31 January and 31 July 2007 (control group, n = 731), and between 31 August 2007 and 6 February 2008 (alert group, n = 654). StatView® was used for statistical analysis.

Results

The mean BG per patient, the glycemic penalty index (GPI) [2] and the hyperglycaemic index (HGI) [3] were significantly lower after implementation of the alert. There were fewer patients in the alert group who experienced at least one episode of BG <40 mg/dl. The amount of BG samples drawn per patient was similar in both groups (Table 1).

Conclusion

Even in an environment where TGC is performed well, a simple computer alert can further improve BG level control and reduce the risk of hypoglycemia, without increasing the BG sample rate.

References

  1. Berghe G, et al.: Intensive insulin therapy in critically ill patients.

    N Engl J Med 2001, 345:1359-1367. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  2. Van Herpe T, et al.: Glycemic penalty index for adequately assessing and comparing different blood glucose control algorithms.

    Crit Care 2008, 12:R24. PubMed Abstract | BioMed Central Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  3. Vogelzang M, et al.: Hyperglycaemic index as a tool to assess glucose control: a retrospective study.

    Crit Care 2004, 8:R122-R127. PubMed Abstract | BioMed Central Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL