Critical Care

official impact factor 4.60

Commentary

Utile or futile: biomarkers in the ICU

Cathrin Balmelli, Beatrice Drexler and Christian Mueller*

Author Affiliations

Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital, Petersgraben 4, CH - 4031 - Basel, Switzerland

For all author emails, please log on.

Critical Care 2011, 15:131 doi:10.1186/cc10056


Please see related research by Wang et al., http://ccforum.com/content/15/1/R42

Published: 9 March 2011

Abstract

Biomarkers complement other clinical information by proving quantitative data regarding a pathophysiological mechanism that can be used for the early diagnosis of a specific disease, to monitor and guide treatment, and to predict the risk of death or other adverse events. The stronger the link between the information provided by the biomarker and the immediate clinical course of action that we physicians take in response, the higher the clinical utility of the biomarker. This link is weakest for prognostic biomarkers applied in patients with a wide variety of diseases, such as in unselected intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Although the added value on top of current ICU mortality scores seems to be too low to justify clinical use, the observation that hemodynamic cardiac stress and inflammation are present in multiple conditions provides important insights into the pathophysiology of common disorders in the ICU.