Critical Care

official impact factor 4.60

This article is part of the supplement: 31st International Symposium on Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine

Poster presentation

Different effect of CVVHDF and coupled plasma filtration and adsorption on IL-6 and procalcitonin in sepsis

F Turani*, M Falco, R Barchetta, F Candidi, A Marinelli and C Di Corato

  • * Corresponding author: F Turani

Author Affiliations

European Aurelia Hospital, Rome, Italy

For all author emails, please log on.

Critical Care 2011, 15(Suppl 1):P117 doi:10.1186/cc9537


The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://ccforum.com/content/15/S1/P117


Published:11 March 2011

© 2011 Turani et al.

Introduction

A decrease of IL-6 and procalcitonin (PCT) correlates with survival during sepsis [1]. Coupled plasma filtration and adsorption (CPFA) supports the renal function and removes proinflammatory mediators, but few clinical studies compare the effects of CPFA and CVVHDF, the standard of care in septic patients with renal failure [2]. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether CPFA and CVVHD have a different effect on IL-6 and PCT in septic patients.

Methods

Seventy septic patients have been enrolled in this study. Fifty-five patients were submitted to CPFA. Every patient had four CPFA treatments (LINDA; Bellco-Mirandola, Italy) for 8 hours with Qb = 200 ml/minute, Q ultrafiltration = 30 ml/kg/hour and Q plasma = 20% of Qb. Fifteen septic patients submitted to CVVHDF were used as the control group. At T0 (basal), T1 (after 24 hours), T2 (after 76 hours), plasma IL-6 and plasma PCT was evaluated. ANOVA was used to compare changes during times study. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Tables 1 and 2 present the main results of this study. In the CPFA group at T2 IL-6 and PCT decreased to lower levels than T0, whereas in CVVHDF no significant change was observed. Hemodynamic data and adrenergic support improved more in the CPFA group than in the CVVHDF group.

Table 1. IL-6 and procalcitonin during CPFA

Table 2. IL-6 and procalcitonin during CVVHDF

Conclusions

CPFA seems more efficient then CVVHDF to remove either IL-6 or PCT and to improve hemodynamic status. Further studies are warranted to show whether these data may translate into a better clinical outcome.

References

  1. Nakada , et al.:

    Mol Med. 2008, 14:257-263. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  2. Lentini P, et al.:

    G Ital Nefrol. 2009, 6:695-703. OpenURL