Open Access Highly Accessed Research

Prognostic impact of fecal pH in critically ill patients

Akinori Osuka1*, Kentaro Shimizu2, Hiroshi Ogura1, Osamu Tasaki1, Toshimitsu Hamasaki3, Takashi Asahara4, Koji Nomoto4, Masami Morotomi4, Yasuyuki Kuwagata1 and Takeshi Shimazu1

Author Affiliations

1 Department of Traumatology and Acute Critical Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-15 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan

2 Department of Clinical Quality Management, Osaka University Hospital, 2-15 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan

3 Department of Biomedical Statistics, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-15 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan

4 Yakult Central Institute for Microbiological Research, 1796 Yaho, Kunitachi, Tokyo, 186-8650, Japan

For all author emails, please log on.

Critical Care 2012, 16:R119 doi:10.1186/cc11413


See related commentary by Alverdy, http://ccforum.com/content/16/5/150

Published: 10 July 2012

Abstract

Introduction

We have reported that altered gut flora is associated with septic complications and eventual death in critically ill patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome. It is unclear how fecal pH affects these patients. We sought to determine whether fecal pH can be used as an assessment tool for the clinical course of critically ill patients.

Methods

Four hundred ninety-one fecal samples were collected from 138 patients who were admitted to the Department of Traumatology and Acute Critical Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan. These patients were treated in the intensive care unit for more than 2 days. Fecal pH, fecal organic acids, and fecal bacteria counts were measured and compared by survived group and nonsurvived group, or nonbacteremia group and bacteremia group. Logistic regression was used to estimate relations between fecal pH, age, sex, or APACHE II score and mortality, and incidence of bacteremia. Differences in fecal organic acids or fecal bacteria counts among acidic, neutral, and alkaline feces were analyzed.

Results

The increase of fecal pH 6.6 was significantly associated with the increased mortality (odds ratio, 2.46; 95% confidence interval, 1.25 to 4.82) or incidence of bacteremia (3.25; 1.67 to 6.30). Total organic acid was increased in acidic feces and decreased in alkaline feces. Lactic acid, succinic acid, and formic acid were the main contributors to acidity in acidic feces. In alkaline feces, acetic acid was significantly decreased. Propionic acid was markedly decreased in both acidic and alkaline feces compared with neutral feces. No differences were noted among the groups in bacterial counts.

Conclusions

The data presented here demonstrate that the fecal pH range that extended beyond the normal range was associated with the clinical course and prognosis of critically ill patients.