Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from Critical Care and BioMed Central.

This article is part of the supplement: 32nd International Symposium on Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine

Poster presentation

Prevalence of pituitary disorders associated with traumatic brain injury: a systematic review

F Lauzier1*, O Lachance1, B Senay2, I Côté2, P Archambault2, F Lamontagne3, A Boutin1, L Moore1, F Bernard4, C Gagnon2, D Cook5 and AF Turgeon1

  • * Corresponding author: F Lauzier

Author Affiliations

1 CHA-Hôpital de l'Enfant-Jésus, Université Laval, Québec, Canada

2 Université Laval, Québec, Canada

3 Université de Sherbrooke, Canada

4 Université de Montréal, Canada

5 McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada

For all author emails, please log on.

Critical Care 2012, 16(Suppl 1):P299  doi:10.1186/cc10906

The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://ccforum.com/content/16/S1/P299


Published:20 March 2012

© 2012 Lauzier et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Introduction

Pituitary disorders are an often-neglected consequence of traumatic brain injury (TBI). We systematically reviewed their prevalence in studies with low risk of bias including moderate/severe TBI patients.

Methods

We searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register, BIOSIS, Trip Database, references of included studies and narrative reviews. We included cohort studies, cross-sectional studies and RCTs that tested the integrity of ≥1 pituitary axis in adult victims of TBI. Two investigators independently reviewed selected citations, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias. Studies including <10% of mild TBI victims were considered as involving mainly moderate/severe TBI patients. Prevalence is reported as weighted mean (lowest and highest prevalence) in three time-frames: acute (<1 month post TBI), mid (3 to 12 months) and long-term setting (>12 months). Studies were considered at low risk of bias if the authors defined inclusion/exclusion criteria, avoided voluntary sampling, and tested >90% of included patients with proper detailed diagnostic criteria. Studies testing all pituitary axes were considered as evaluating hypopituitarism, which was defined as the dysfunction of at least one axis.

Results

Among 12,514 citations, we included 55 studies (4,648 patients). Patients suffered from mild (11.9%, n = 555), moderate (7.9%, n = 367) and severe (30.4%, n = 1,415) TBI, others being of unknown severity. Prevalences of pituitary axis dysfunction are reported in Table 1. Few studies considering mainly moderate/severe TBI patients were at low risk of bias.

Conclusion

Pituitary disorders frequently arise after TBI, but prevalence remains uncertain due to low overall quality of available data. Factors other than methodological quality and TBI severity are likely to explain the observed wide prevalence ranges. The clinical significance of TBI-associated pituitary disorders also requires further rigorous evaluation.