Reasearch Awards nomination

Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from Critical Care and BioMed Central.

Open Access Highly Accessed Research

Cardiac index and oxygen delivery during low and high tidal volume ventilation strategies in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a crossover randomized clinical trial

Giuseppe Natalini1*, Cosetta Minelli2, Antonio Rosano1, Pierluigi Ferretti1, Carmine R Militano1, Carlo De Feo3 and Achille Bernardini1

Author Affiliations

1 General Intensive Care Unit, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy

2 Centre for Biomedicine, EURAC research, Bolzano, Italy

3 Intensive Care Unit, Desenzano del Garda Hospital, Desenzano del Garda, Italy

For all author emails, please log on.

Critical Care 2013, 17:R146  doi:10.1186/cc12825

Published: 23 July 2013

Abstract

Introduction

The beneficial effect of low tidal volume (TV) ventilation strategy on mortality in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has been attributed to the protective effect on ventilator-induced lung injury, and yet its effect on cardiovascular function might also play an important role. The aim of this study was to assess whether low TV ventilation improves cardiac output and oxygen delivery compared with high TV ventilation strategy in patients with ARDS.

Methods

In this crossover randomized clinical trial 16 ARDS patients were recruited in an intensive care unit at a university-affiliated hospital. Each patient was ventilated for 30 min with low (6 mL/kg) and 30 min with high (12 mL/kg) TV. The two experimental periods, applied in random order and with allocation concealment, were separated by 30 min of basal ventilation. Minute ventilation was constantly maintained by appropriate respiratory rate changes.

Results

Compared with high TV ventilation, low TV ventilation showed decreased pH (7.37 vs. 7.41, P = 0.001) and increased PaCO2 (49 vs. 43 mmHg; P = 0.002). Cardiac index and oxygen delivery index were increased with low compared with high TV ventilation (3.9 vs. 3.5 L.min-1.m-2, P = 0.012, and 521 vs. 463 mL.min-1.m-2, P = 0.002, respectively), while oxygen extraction ratio decreased (0.36 vs. 0.44, P = 0.027). In four patients oxygen extraction ratio was >0.5 during high TV but not during low TV strategy. The magnitude of the change in cardiac index was positively associated with PaCO2 variation (P = 0.004), while it was unrelated to the magnitude of changes in TV and airway pressure. The decrease of cardiac index was predicted by PaCO2 reduction, with and area under ROC curve of 0.72.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that a low TV ventilation strategy increases cardiac index and oxygen delivery, thus supporting the hypothesis that the beneficial effect of low TV ventilation in patients with ARDS could be partially explained by hemodynamic improvement. In other words, low tidal volume ventilation could be protective also for the cardiovascular system and not only for the lung. The slight increase of PaCO2 during low TV ventilation seems to predict the increase of cardiac index.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00713713

Keywords:
Cardiac Output; Tidal Volume; Respiratory Distress Syndrome; Adult; Hemodynamics