Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from Critical Care and BioMed Central.

This article is part of the supplement: 33rd International Symposium on Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine

Poster presentation

Procedural sedation in the emergency department

MS Shah1*, FS Shah2, KP Pope3 and AS Abbas4

  • * Corresponding author: MS Shah

Author Affiliations

1 Luton and Dunstable Hospital, London, UK

2 Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK

3 Chesterfield NHS Trust, Chesterfield, UK

4 Colchester Hospital, Colchester, UK

For all author emails, please log on.

Critical Care 2013, 17(Suppl 2):P380  doi:10.1186/cc12318


The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://ccforum.com/content/17/S2/P380


Published:19 March 2013

© 2013 Shah et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Introduction

Are safety guidelines being followed when administering procedural sedation in the emergency department? Between November 2004 and November 2008, the NPSA received 498 alerts of patients being given the wrong dose of midazolam for procedural sedation [1]. In the first 5 years of midazolam use there were 86 deaths, most related to procedural sedation [2].

Methods

We searched through the controlled drugs book in resuscitation over a 2-month period and found a list of patients who had received midazolam or fentanyl. From this, we could make a search for the relevant A and E notes for these patients. From these notes, we looked for (see shorthand in Table 1): verbal consent documentation (consent), past medical history recorded (pmhx), safe initial dose of midazolam (midaz), pre-procedure monitoring (pre), post-procedure monitoring (post), and monitoring for 1 hour before discharge (1 hr). Following introduction of a reminder in the controlled drugs book/sedation room and staff education, the case notes were analysed over another 2-month period (24 sets of notes) to assess practise against safety guidelines.

Results

See Table 1 (key for shorthand in Methods).

Conclusion

The re-audit notices within the procedural sedation room and controlled drug book front cover served as a reminder of good practise. The visibility of this reminder (within the CD book) helped ensure better adherence to the audit standard. This reminder will now be kept within the CD book.

Table 1. Before and after education programme and reminder in the controlled drugs book

References

  1. [http:/ / www.npsa.nhs.uk/ corporate/ news/ reducing-risk-of-midazolam-overdos e-in-adults] webcite

  2. Epstein B:

    Data Retrieval Unit HFD-737.

    Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research; 27 June 1989

    OpenURL