Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from Critical Care and BioMed Central.

This article is part of the supplement: 33rd International Symposium on Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine

Poster presentation

Quality assurance in severe sepsis: an individualised audit/feedback system results in substantial improvements at a UK teaching hospital

M Simmonds*, E Blyth, W Robson and M Chikhani

  • * Corresponding author: M Simmonds

Author Affiliations

Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK

For all author emails, please log on.

Critical Care 2013, 17(Suppl 2):P500  doi:10.1186/cc12438

The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://ccforum.com/content/17/S2/P500


Published:19 March 2013

© 2013 Simmonds et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Introduction

Following our study of severe sepsis care across three centres [1], we aimed to introduce a rapid feedback mechanism into our rolling audit programme. Whilst previous audits raised awareness of severe sepsis, only whole organisation performance was reported and no feedback was given to individual clinicians. It is recognised that such feedback loops can improve clinical practice [2].

Methods

Patients admitted to critical care (58 beds, four units) with a primary admission diagnosis of infection were screened for severe sepsis. Pre-ICU care was then audited against the Surviving Sepsis Guidelines [3]. Time zero is defined as when criteria for severe sepsis were first met. An individualised traffic-light report was then generated and emailed to the patient's consultant and other stakeholders involved in care (Figure 1). We aimed to report cases within 7 days of critical care admission. A cumulative report is generated monthly to track organisation-wide performance.

thumbnailFigure 1. Example report.

Results

Since November 2011, 153 cases of severe sepsis have been audited and reported back to clinicians. Compliance with antibiotics in <1 hour has risen from 35 to 75% and compliance with the pre-ICU elements of the resuscitation bundle has risen from 20 to 70% (Figure 2). Feedback from clinicians has been encouraging as our reports highlight both positive and negative examples of practice.

thumbnailFigure 2. Compliance with pre-ICU resuscitation bundle.

Conclusion

Individualised feedback on sepsis care has led to substantial improvements in guideline compliance. This concept could be translated to other time-dependent patient pathways.

References

  1. Simmonds MJR, Chikhani M, Smith P, et al.: Multi-departmental system analysis is needed for evaluation of severe sepsis care: a multi-centre study [abstract]. In Presented at the BMJ International Forum on Quality and Safety in Healthcare. Amsterdam; 2011. OpenURL

  2. Jamtvedt G, Young JM, Kristoffersen DT, et al.: Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes.

    Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006, 2:CD000259. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  3. Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Carlet JM, et al.: Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008.

    Crit Care Med 2008, 36:296-327. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL