Research

Prone positioning does not affect cannula function during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or continuous renal replacement therapy

Claudia E Goettler¹, John P Pryor¹ , Brian A Hoey², JoAnne K Phillips³, Michelle C Balas⁴ and Michael B Shapiro⁵

¹Assistant Professor of Surgery, Division of Traumatology and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

²Assistant Professor of Surgery, Division of Traumatology and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, St Luke's Hospital, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, USA

³Clinical Nurse Specialist, Critical Care, Surgical Critical Care Nursing, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

⁴Senior Critical Care Nurse, Surgical Critical Care Nursing, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

⁵Associate Professor of Surgery, Division of Traumatology and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

author email corresponding author email

Critical Care 2002, 6:452-455doi:10.1186/cc1814

Published:	29 August 2002

Abstract

Introduction

Prone positioning in respiratory failure has been shown to be a useful adjunct in the treatment of severe hypoxia. However, the prone position can result in dislodgment or malfunction of tubes and cannulae. Certain patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) or continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) may also benefit from positional therapy. The impact of cannula-related complications in these patients is potentially disastrous. The safety and efficacy of prone positioning of these patients has not been previously reported.

Materials and methods

A retrospective chart review evaluated ECMO or CRRT cannula location, and displacement or malfunction during positional change or while prone. The study was set in a General Surgery and Trauma Intensive Care Unit. The subjects were all patients at our institution who simultaneously underwent ECMO or CRRT and prone positioning from July 1996 to July 2001. There were no interventions.

Results

Ten patients underwent ECMO and 42 patients underwent CRRT during the study period. Seven patients underwent simultaneous prone positioning and either ECMO (4/10) or CRRT (4/42). A total of 68 turning events (prone to supine or supine to prone) were recorded, with each patient averaging 9.7 (range, 4–16) turning episodes. Turning was performed with sheets and extra nursing personnel; no special mechanical assist devices were used. No patients experienced inadvertent cannula removal during turning. Two patients had poor flow through their cannulae. In one patient, this occurred in the supine position and required repositioning of the cannula. In the second patient, cannulae were changed twice and flow was poor in both the supine and the prone positions. All ECMO and CRRT patients received venous cannulae. Cannula location (seven internal jugular and 11 femoral) did not the affect risk of malfunction.

Discussion and conclusions

Patients with venous cannulae for ECMO or CRRT can be safely placed in the prone position. Flow rates are maintained in this position. Potential cannula complications of ECMO and CRRT are not a contraindication to prone positioning in severely ill patients.