Log on / register
BioMed Central home | Journals A-Z | Feedback | Support
 

This article is part of the supplement: 19th Spring Meeting of the Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthetists

Meeting abstract

An audit of re-admission to intensive care after initial recovery from pulmonary resection: is it worthwhile?

JE Pilling, AE Martin-Ucar and DA Waller

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester LE3 9QP, UK

from 19th Spring Meeting of the Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthetists
Cambridge, UK. 21 June 2002

Critical Care 2002, 6(Suppl 2):3doi:10.1186/cc1807

Published: 9 July 2002

Objective

To audit the outcome of patients admitted to a general intensive care unit (ICU) from a thoracic high dependency unit (HDU) after pulmonary resection.

Methods

A retrospective case note review of 28 consecutive patients (22 male, six female; median age, 66 years [range, 48–80 years]) admitted to the ICU following initial recovery on an HDU after pulmonary resection, in a 3-year period, in a single surgeon thoracic surgical practice.

Results

ICU and 6-month mortalities were 47% (13 patients) and 64% (18 patients), respectively. Need for mechanical ventilation (P = 0.006) and subsequent renal support (P = 0.05) were predictors of hospital mortality on multivariate analysis. All four patients who required both ventilation and renal support died. Only two of 17 patients (12%) who required mechanical ventilation were alive at 6 months (P = 0.002). Age, sex, preoperative pulmonary function, extent of resection, diagnosis, need for reoperation and inotropic requirements were not predictors of poor outcome. Patients who died in the ICU (n = 13) stayed for longer (mean, 17.6 days versus 5.3 days; P = 0.04) and at a higher average cost per patient (£21,992 versus £5300; P = 0.04) than those who survived (n = 15).

Conclusions

Mechanical ventilation for subsequent respiratory complications after initial recovery from lung resection is generally not worthwhile.

.

Have something to say? Post a comment on this article!


Published by
© 1999-2008 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated < info@ccforum.com >   Terms and conditions