Table 1

Selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD) schemes and outcomes of prospective randomized trials

Reference
Number of patients
Pulmonary infection incidence (%), control versus SDD
P value
Mortality (%), control versus SDD
P value

Aerdts et al. [14]
88
69.2 vs 5.9
0.0001
15.4 vs 11.8
Not significant
Blair et al. [15]
256
34.4 vs 9.7
0.002
21.4 vs 10.5
Not significant
de Jonge et al. [11]
934
-a
-a
22.9 vs 14.8
0.002
Cockerill et al. [16]
150
18.6 vs 5.3
0.03
21.3 vs 14.7
Not significant
Jacobs et al. [17]
79
9.3 vs 0
< 0.05
53.5 vs 38.8
Not significant
Kerver et al. [18]
96
85.1 vs 12.2
< 0.01
32.0 vs 28.5
Not significant
Krueger et al. [19]
546
11.1 vs 2.3
0.007
28.6 vs 19.6
Not significantb
Palomar et al. [20]
83
50.0 vs 17.1
0.005
31.0 vs 24.4
Not significant
Rocha et al. [21]
101
46.3 vs 14.9
< 0.001
44.4 vs 21.3
< 0.05c
Sanchez-Garcia et al. [22]
271
29.3 vs11.5
0.05
47.1 vs 38.9
Not significant
Ulrich et al. [23]
100
55.8 vs 14.6
< 0.001
53.8 vs 31.3
< 0.02c
Verwaest et al. [24]
440
11.4 vs 6.6
< 0.05
16.8 vs 15.5
Not significant
Verwaest et al. [24]
440
11.4 vs 7.0
< 0.05
17.6 vs 15.5
Not significant
Winter et al. [25]
183
34.8 vs 3.3
< 0.01
43.5 vs 36.3
Not significant

a Not evaluated. b Overall intensive care unit mortality was not statistically different, but the mortality was significantly reduced for patients with Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores of 20–29 on admission. c Not significant on intention-to-treat analysis.

Schultz et al. Critical Care 2003 7:107   doi:10.1186/cc1873