Table 3 |
|||||
|
Clinical studies reporting effects of norepinephrine on splanchnic haemodynamics |
|||||
|
Reference |
n |
Drug (μg/kg per min) |
Splanchnic blood flow |
pHi or PCO2 gap |
Comments |
|
|
|||||
|
[44] |
5 |
Norepinephrine NA versus phenylephrine 3.2 |
HSBF ↓ |
PCO2 gap = |
Switch from norepinephrine to phenylephrine |
|
[11] |
12 |
Epinephrine 0.7 ± 0.1 versus norepinephrine 1 ± 0.6 versus norepinephrine + dobutamine 1.1 ± 0.6 and 5 |
LD ↑ in mucosal blood flow with epinephrine and norepinephrine + dobutamine, as compared with norepinephrine alone |
NA |
Epinephrine, norepinephrine in random order to achieve MAP 70–80 mmHg |
|
[46] |
11 |
Epinephrine 0.3 ± 0.2 |
LD epinephrine ↑ mucosal |
NA |
|
|
11 |
versus norepinephrine + dobutamine 0.9 ± 0.4 and 5 |
blood flow |
|||
|
[45] |
8 |
Epinephrine 0.48 ± 0.33 versus norepinephrine + dobutamine 0.37 ± 0.2 and 13.6 ± 3 |
HSBF ↓ with epinephrine |
pHi ↓ |
Cross-over study |
|
|
|||||
|
NA, not avalaible; HSBF, hepatosplanchnic blood flow determined by the indocyanin green (ICG) continuous infusion; LD, laser Doppler; MAP, mean arterial pressure; PCO2 gap, gastric mucosal–arterial gradient of PCO2; pHi, intramucosal pH. |
|||||
|
Asfar et al. Critical Care 2004 8:170 doi:10.1186/cc2418 |
|||||