Table 1

Haemodynamics during acute lung injury in sheep

Parameter
Group
Time point (hours)





0
1
2
3
4
5
6

PVRI (dyne·s/cm5 per m2)
Sham
117 ± 14
131 ± 19
141 ± 10
145 ± 11
114 ± 21
133 ± 13
151 ± 16

LPS
115 ± 6
284 ± 20*
240 ± 21*
198 ± 31
193 ± 26*
199 ± 23*
182 ± 16*

OA
103 ± 9
351 ± 64‡§
300 ± 45‡§
-
-
-
-
GEDVI (ml/m2)
Sham
570 ± 46
601 ± 68
572 ± 43
566 ± 12
661 ± 74
607 ± 67
655 ± 60

LPS
571 ± 23
620 ± 57
564 ± 32
579 ± 42
598 ± 38
624 ± 42
615 ± 37

OA
646 ± 38
629 ± 60
590 ± 55
-
-
-
-
ITBVI (ml/m2)
Sham
764 ± 62
806 ± 91
766 ± 58
759 ± 16
886 ± 99
813 ± 90
878 ± 81

LPS
765 ± 30
831 ± 76
756 ± 43
776 ± 57
801 ± 51
836 ± 57
825 ± 49

OA
866 ± 51
912 ± 42
790 ± 74
-
-
-
-
HR (beats/min)
Sham
106 ± 6
104 ± 8
96 ± 7
91 ± 5
99 ± 6
98 ± 11
97 ± 5

LPS
96 ± 4
122 ± 6
109 ± 6
109 ± 4*
109 ± 8
122 ± 4*
130 ± 5*

OA
111 ± 5
104 ± 13
102 ± 13
-
-
-
-
CI (l/min per m2)
Sham
5.7 ± 0.3
5.5 ± 0.3
5.2 ± 0.3
5.1 ± 0.2
5.4 ± 0.4
5.2 ± 0.3
5.3 ± 0.3

LPS
5.7 ± 0.1
7.3 ± 0.5*†ll
5.9 ± 0.2
5.8 ± 0.3
5.6 ± 0.4
6.2 ± 0.3*
6.8 ± 0.2*

OA
6.1 ± 0.3
4.5 ± 0.3§
4.6 ± 0.5
-
-
-
-
MAP (mmHg)
Sham
102 ± 5
101 ± 6
101 ± 6
101 ± 5
102 ± 5
102 ± 5
101 ± 4

LPS
94 ± 4
104 ± 5
105 ± 3
106 ± 4
105 ± 3
104 ± 5
100 ± 6

OA
94 ± 4
101 ± 2
104 ± 4§
-
-
-
-
SVRI (dyne·s/cm5 per m2)
Sham
1453 ± 101
1496 ± 125
1589 ± 138
1536 ± 105
1579 ± 109
1607 ± 119
1681 ± 169

LPS
1410 ± 81
1128 ± 102
1352 ± 62
1515 ± 107
1428 ± 101
1308 ± 79
1126 ± 58*

OA
1266 ± 63
1847 ± 368
1670 ± 147§
-
-
-
-

Data are expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean. *P < 0.05, LPS versus sham-operated group; P < 0.05, versus t = 0 hours in LPS group; P < 0.05, OA versus sham-operated group; §P < 0.05, versus t = 0 hours in OA group; llP < 0.05, LPS versus OA group. CI, cardiac index; GEDVI, global end-diastolic volume index; HR, heart rate; ITBVI, intrathoracic blood volume index; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; MAP, mean arterial pressure; OA, oleic acid; PVRI, pulmonary vascular resistance index; Sham, sham-operated; SVRI, systemic vascular resistance index.

Kirov et al. Critical Care 2004 8:R451   doi:10.1186/cc2974