Critical Care

official impact factor 4.60

Review

Clinical review: Evidence-based perioperative medicine?

Hanif Meeran1 and Michael PW Grocott2*

Author Affiliations

1 Research Fellow, Centre for Anaesthesia, University College London, UK

2 Research Fellow, Surgical Outcomes Research Centre, University College London Hospitals, UK

For all author emails, please log on.

Critical Care 2005, 9:81-85 doi:10.1186/cc2932

Published: 19 August 2004

Abstract

The present article outlines the basic principles of Evidence Based Medicine (EBM) and how they should guide clinical practice. The evidence supporting a selection of perioperative interventions is assessed against objective criteria. Many of the perioperative interventions that have been widely adopted into clinical practice are supported by very limited evidence. Conversely a high level of evidence supports other interventions that have not been so widely adopted. This may be due to concerns about limitations in the design and conduct of some of the clinical trials.

Keywords:
anaesthesia; evidence based medicine; perioperative; surgery