Table 2 |
||
|
Published trials of low-dose vasopressin in human septic shock |
||
|
Reference |
Study design (n) |
Observed effects |
|
|
||
|
[1] |
Case series (5) |
A, B, C |
|
[3] |
Matched cohort (19) |
A, B, D |
|
[9] |
Randomized clinical trial versus placebo (10) |
A, B |
|
[15] |
Case series (16) |
A, C |
|
[16] |
Case series (50) |
A, B, C |
|
[17] |
Retrospective case series (38) |
A |
|
[18] |
Randomized clinical trial: noradrenaline + vasopressin versus noradrenaline (48) |
A, B, C, E, F |
|
[19] |
Randomized clinical trial: noradrenaline versus vasopressin (24) |
B, C, D, F, G |
|
[99] |
Cases series (11) |
H |
|
[100] |
Noradrenaline versus vasopressin (12) |
A, F, H |
|
|
||
|
A, significant increase in blood pressure; B, decrease in catecholamines related to an increase in blood pressure; C, increase in urine output; D, low doses of measured vasopressin; E, increase in systemic vascular resistance; F, absence of effect on mesenteric circulation; G, improvement in creatinine clearance; H, hypoperfusion of the gastric mucosa. |
||
|
Delmas et al. Critical Care 2005 9:212 doi:10.1186/cc2945 |
||