Log on / register
BioMed Central home | Journals A-Z | Feedback | Support | My details

This article is part of a series on Disaster Management, edited by J. Christopher Farmer.

Review

Clinical Review: Communication and logistics in the response to the 1998 terrorist bombing in Omagh, Northern Ireland

Gavin G Lavery1 email and Ene Horan2

1Director of Critical Care Services, Royal Group Hospitals Trust, Belfast, UK

2Specialist Registrar, Northern Ireland Intensive Care Medicine Training Programme, Royal Group Hospitals Trust, Belfast, UK

author email corresponding author email

Critical Care 2005, 9:401-408doi:10.1186/cc3502

Published: 23 March 2005

Abstract

The Omagh bombing in August 1998 produced many of the problems documented in other major incidents. An initial imbalance between the demand and supply of clinical resources at the local hospital, poor information due to telecommunication problems, the need to triage victims and the need to transport the most severely injured significant distances were the most serious issues. The Royal Group Hospitals Trust (RGHT) received 30 severely injured secondary transfers over a 5-hour period, which stressed the hospital's systems even with the presence of extra staff that arrived voluntarily before the hospital's major incident plan was activated. Many patients were transferred to the RGHT by helicopter, but much of the time the gained advantage was lost due to lack of a helipad within the RGHT site. Identifying patients and tracking them through the hospital system was problematic. While the major incident plan ensured that communication with the relatives and the media was effective and timely, communication between the key clinical and managerial staff was hampered by the need to be mobile and by the limitations of the internal telephone system. The use of mobile anaesthetic teams helped maintain the flow of patients between the Emergency Department and radiology, operating theatres or the intensive care unit (ICU). The mobile anaesthetic teams were also responsible for efficient and timely resupply of the Emergency Department, which worked well. In the days that followed many victims required further surgical procedures. Coordination of the multidisciplinary teams required for many of these procedures was difficult. Although only seven patients required admission to adult general intensive care, no ICU beds were available for other admissions over the following 5 days. A total of 165 days of adult ICU treatment were required for the victims of the bombing.


© 1999-2009 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated. Part of Springer Science+Business Media.