Critical Care

official impact factor 4.60

Commentary

Pulse oximeter as a sensor of fluid responsiveness: do we have our finger on the best solution?

Xavier Monnet1, Bouchra Lamia1 and Jean-Louis Teboul2*

Author Affiliations

1 Assistant Professor, Service de Réanimation Médicale, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bicêtre, Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France

2 Professor, Service de Réanimation Médicale, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bicêtre, Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France

For all author emails, please log on.

Critical Care 2005, 9:429-430 doi:10.1186/cc3876

Published: 28 September 2005

Abstract

The pulse oximetry plethysmographic signal resembles the peripheral arterial pressure waveform, and the degree of respiratory variation in the pulse oximetry wave is close to the degree of respiratory arterial pulse pressure variation. Thus, it is tempting to speculate that pulse oximetry can be used to assess preload responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients. In this commentary we briefly review the complex meaning of the pulse oximetry plethysmographic signal and highlight the advantages, limitations and pitfalls of the pulse oximetry method. Future studies including volume challenge must be performed to test whether the pulse oximetry waveform can really serve as a nonivasive tool for the guidance of fluid therapy in patients receiving mechanical ventilation in intensive care units and in operating rooms.