Log on / register
BioMed Central home | Journals A-Z | Feedback | Support | My details
 
Highly AccessLetter

Mechanical ventilation in severe asthma

Randolph P Cole email

Medical Director of Critical Care, Holy Name Hospital, Teaneck, New Jersey, USA

author email corresponding author email

Critical Care 2005, 9:E29doi:10.1186/cc3925



See related review by Stather and Stewart http://ccforum.com/content/9/6/581

Published: 22 November 2005

© 2005 BioMed Central Ltd

Letter

In their review on mechanical ventilation in severe asthma, Stather and Stewart [1] raise a concern that use of external positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) will result in increased total PEEP and worsened gas trapping [1]. Of critical importance to our understanding of whether application of external PEEP will be beneficial is assessment of the presence or absence of expiratory flow limitation [2,3]. When the severity of airflow obstruction is such that flow limitation is present, application of PEEP will not influence expiratory flow or upstream pressures. At the bedside, one can examine for this by noting the effect of applied external PEEP on the inflation pressure of subsequent breaths. In the absence of flow limitation, increased external PEEP will be transmitted upstream, causing parallel increases in alveolar pressure, peak airway pressure, and end-inspiratory pressure. The associated increase in lung volume will tend to moderate this rise in airway pressure. When flow limitation is present, upstream pressures are 'protected' from increases in downstream pressure (or PEEP). In this situation, inflation pressures are independent of external PEEP. Occasionally, inflation pressure may actually decrease with external PEEP. Here, the external PEEP may act to 'stent open' the central airways and allow reduction in gas trapping and reduction in end-expiratory lung volumes [4]. Examination of the effect of increasing external PEEP on inflation pressure may allow identification of those patients who might benefit from administration of external PEEP.

Competing interests

The author(s) declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  1. Stather DR, Stewart TE: Clinical review: Mechanical ventilation in severe asthma.

    Crit Care 2005, in press. OpenURL

  2. Mead J, Turner JM, Macklem PT, Little JB: Significance of the relationship between lung recoil and maximum expiratory flow.

    J Appl Physiol 1967, 22:95-108. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  3. Pride NB, Permutt S, Riley RL, Bromberger-Barnea B: Determinants of maximal expiratory flow from the lungs.

    J Appl Physiol 1967, 23:646-662. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  4. Qvist J, Andersen JB, Pemberton M, Bennike KA: High-level PEEP in severe asthma.

    N Engl J Med 1982, 307:1347-1348. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

Have something to say? Post a comment on this article!


© 1999-2009 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated. Part of Springer Science+Business Media.