A laboratory assessment of the learning and retention of skills required to use the Combitube and Laryngeal Mask Airway by non-anaesthetists

cc1075 CCJ Meeting abstract A laboratory assessment of the learning and retention of skills required to use the Combitube and Laryngeal Mask Airway by non-anaesthetists Coles C Elding C Mercer M

Department of Anaesthesia, Frenchay Hospital, Bristol BS16 1LE, UK

Critical Care 21st International Symposium on Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine Meeting abstracts 21st International Symposium on Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine Brussels, Belgium

20–23 March 2001

1364-8535 2001 5 Suppl 1 P004 10.1186/cc1075 15 1 2001 2 3 2001 cc-5-s1-p004

Both the Combitube and Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) have been successfully used by non-anaesthetists during resuscitation [1,2,3,4,5]. However, only one study (using the Combitube) has assessed how well these skills are retained after the initial training period. Here, nine of 11 paramedics demonstrated inadequate skill retention in the follow-up study at 15 months [6].

Study purpose

To assess and compare the ability of non-anaesthetists to learn and retain the skills necessary to use the Combitube and Laryngeal Mask Airways.

Method

With no prior warning, 10 non-anaesthetists (3 student nurses, 2 qualified nurses and 5 trainee operating department practitioners) took part in a study morning covering theoretical aspects of Combitube and LMA insertion and use, and a practical demonstration and practice session. This was followed by a written examination of 30 yes/no questions and a practical assessment for each airway device. Eight weeks later, again with no prior warning, the same 10 people retook the same written examinations and practical assessments.

Results

The mean decrease in score between the first and second visits was -1.3 (95% confidence limits, -0.13 to -2.47; P < 0.05) for the Combitube, and -0.5 (95% confidence limits, 0.63 to -1.63; P < 0.5) for the LMA.

Conclusion

This study suggests that the practical use of the Combitube is an easier skill to acquire than the LMA. Not surprisingly retention of theoretical and practical skills for both the Combitube and LMA deteriorated over a short time span (although not reaching statistical significance for theoretical LMA scores). Therefore, whatever airway device non-anaesthetists are taught to use, regular refresher courses will be needed.

However, larger numbers need to be studied to corroborate these findings.

Table 1

Results of written examinations (means quoted)

First visit

Second visit

Combitube

83.3%

25/30

79%

23.7/30

LMA

91.3%

27.4/30

89.7%

26.9/30

Table 2

Results of practical assessments

Combitube (n = 10)

LMA (n = 10)

First

Second

First

Second

visit

Successful insertions

within 60 seconds

Required number of insertion attempts before success

Number using correct

cuff volumes

8 (n = 9)

Number showing evidence

of ventilation

9 (n = 9)

Emergency intubation with the Combitube: comparison with the endotracheal airway. Staudinger T Brugger S Watschinger B Roggla M Dielacher C Lobl T Fink D Klauser R Frass M Ann Emerg Med 1993 22 1573 1575 10.1016/S0196-0644(05)81261-2 8214838 Combat trauma airway management: endotracheal intubation versus laryngeal mask airway versus combitube use by Navy SEAL and Reconnaissance combat corpsmen. Calkins MD Robinson TD J Trauma 1999 46 927 932 10338414 Failed rapid sequence intubation in trauma patients: esophageal tracheal combitube is a useful adjunct. Blostein PA Koestner AJ Hoak S J Trauma 1998 44 534 537 9529185 Choice of airway devices for 12,020 cases of nontraumatic cardiac arrest in Japan. Tanigawa K Shigematsu A Prehosp Emerg Care 1998 2 96 100 9709326 The PTL, Combitube, laryngeal mask, and oral airway: a randomized prehospital comparative study of ventilatory device effectiveness and cost-effectiveness in 470 cases of cardiorespiratory arrest. Rumball CJ MacDonald D Prehosp Emerg Care 1997 1 1 10 9709312 Ability of paramedics to use the Combitube in prehospital cardiac arrest. Atherton GL Johnson JC Ann Emerg Med 1993 22 1263 1268 10.1016/S0196-0644(05)80104-0 8333625