<?xml version='1.0'?>
<!DOCTYPE art SYSTEM 'http://www.biomedcentral.com/xml/article.dtd'>
<art>
   <ui>cc6229</ui>
   <ji>CCJ</ji>
   <fm>
      <dochead>Poster presentation</dochead>
      <bibl>
         <title>
            <p>Community-acquired and healthcare-related urosepsis: a multicenter prospective study</p>
         </title>
         <aug>
            <au id="A1">
               <snm>Cardoso</snm>
               <fnm>T</fnm>
               <insr iid="I1"/>
            </au>
            <au id="A2">
               <snm>Ribeiro</snm>
               <fnm>O</fnm>
               <insr iid="I2"/>
            </au>
            <au id="A3">
               <snm>Costa-Pereira</snm>
               <fnm>A</fnm>
               <insr iid="I2"/>
            </au>
            <au id="A4">
               <snm>Carneiro</snm>
               <fnm>A</fnm>
               <insr iid="I1"/>
            </au>
            <au id="A5">
               <cnm>A SACiUCI Study Group</cnm>
               <insr iid="I1"/>
            </au>
         </aug>
         <insg>
            <ins id="I1">
               <p>Hospital Geral Sto Ant&#243;nio, Porto, Portugal</p>
            </ins>
            <ins id="I2">
               <p>Faculty of Medicine, University of Oporto, Porto, Portugal</p>
            </ins>
         </insg>
         <source>Critical Care</source>
         <supplement>
            <title>
               <p>28th International Symposium on Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine</p>
            </title>
            <note>Meeting abstracts</note>
         </supplement>
         <conference>
            <title>
               <p>28th International Symposium on Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine</p>
            </title>
            <location>Brussels, Belgium</location>
            <date-range>18&#8211;21 March 2008</date-range>
            <url>http://www.intensive.org/</url>
         </conference>
         <issn>1364-8535</issn>
         <pubdate>2008</pubdate>
         <volume>12</volume>
         <issue>Suppl 2</issue>
         <fpage>P8</fpage>
         <url>http://ccforum.com/content/12/S2/P8</url>
         <xrefbib>
            <pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/cc6229</pubid>
         </xrefbib>
      </bibl>
      <history>
         <pub>
            <date>
               <day>13</day>
               <month>3</month>
               <year>2008</year>
            </date>
         </pub>
      </history>
      <cpyrt>
         <year>2008</year>
         <collab>BioMed Central Ltd</collab>
      </cpyrt>
   </fm>
   <bdy>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Introduction</p>
         </st>
         <p>Urinary infections are the third focus of infection in sepsis. In this study we describe the epidemiology and microbiology of community-acquired urosepsis, to determine the associated crude mortality and to identify independent predictors of mortality.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Methods</p>
         </st>
         <p>A prospective, multicentered, cohort study on community-acquired urosepsis cases admitted to Portuguese ICUs from 1 December 2004 to 30 November 2005 with a follow-up until discharge.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Results</p>
         </st>
         <p>Seventeen units entered the study from the north to south of Portugal, corresponding to 41% of all mixed national ICU beds. Over this period 4,142 patients were admitted to the study &#8211; 897 (22%) had community-acquired sepsis, and of these 65 (7%) had urosepsis.</p>
         <p>Compared with other focuses of infection, urosepsis was more frequent in women (66% vs 33% in nonurosepsis, <it>P </it>&lt; 0.001), and associated with shorter ICU length of stay (7 days vs 9 days, <it>P </it>= 0.002). No significant differences were observed regarding severity of illness (SAPS II, sepsis severity) or crude mortality. The isolation rate was 68% with 41% positive blood cultures. All isolations, except one, were Gram-negative and no fungus was isolated; <it>Escherichia coli </it>dominated the microbiological profile (63% of all isolations).</p>
         <p>Healthcare-related infection (HCRI) was found in 31% of these patients: <it>E coli </it>represents 58% of all isolations but the resistance profile was different, with resistance to ciprofloxacin and cotrimoxazol increasing from 9% (in community-acquired sepsis) to 25% (in HCRI). The 28-day mortality was higher in the non-HCRI group (29%) than in the HCRI group (15%), although not statistically significant.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Conclusion</p>
         </st>
         <p>Although described as being the focus of infection with better prognosis we could not confirm this for community-acquired urosepsis in the present study. HCRI patients are a particular group with a similar microbiological profile but different resistance profile requiring a different empirical approach.</p>
      </sec>
   </bdy>
   <bm>
      <refgrp>
         <bibl id="B1">
            <title>
               <p>Health care-associated bloodstream infections in adults: a reason to change the accepted definition of community-acquired infections</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Friedman</snm>
                  <fnm>ND</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Kaye</snm>
                  <fnm>KS</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Stout</snm>
                  <fnm>JE</fnm>
               </au>
               <etal/>
            </aug>
            <source>Ann Intern Med</source>
            <pubdate>2002</pubdate>
            <volume>137</volume>
            <fpage>791</fpage>
            <lpage>797</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12435215</pubid>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
      </refgrp>
   </bm>
</art>
