<?xml version='1.0'?>
<!DOCTYPE art SYSTEM 'http://www.biomedcentral.com/xml/article.dtd'>
<art>
   <ui>cc6232</ui>
   <ji>CCJ</ji>
   <fm>
      <dochead>Poster presentation</dochead>
      <bibl>
         <title>
            <p>Healthcare-related bacteraemia admitted to the ICU</p>
         </title>
         <aug>
            <au id="A1">
               <snm>Castro</snm>
               <fnm>G</fnm>
               <insr iid="I1"/>
            </au>
            <au id="A2">
               <snm>Cardoso</snm>
               <fnm>T</fnm>
               <insr iid="I1"/>
            </au>
            <au id="A3">
               <snm>Carneiro</snm>
               <fnm>R</fnm>
               <insr iid="I1"/>
            </au>
            <au id="A4">
               <snm>Ribeiro</snm>
               <fnm>O</fnm>
               <insr iid="I2"/>
            </au>
            <au id="A5">
               <snm>Costa-Pereira</snm>
               <fnm>A</fnm>
               <insr iid="I2"/>
            </au>
            <au id="A6">
               <snm>Carneiro</snm>
               <fnm>A</fnm>
               <insr iid="I1"/>
            </au>
         </aug>
         <insg>
            <ins id="I1">
               <p>Hospital Geral de Santo Ant&#243;nio, Porto, Portugal</p>
            </ins>
            <ins id="I2">
               <p>Faculty of Medicine, University of Oporto, Porto, Portugal</p>
            </ins>
         </insg>
         <source>Critical Care</source>
         <supplement>
            <title>
               <p>28th International Symposium on Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine</p>
            </title>
            <note>Meeting abstracts</note>
         </supplement>
         <conference>
            <title>
               <p>28th International Symposium on Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine</p>
            </title>
            <location>Brussels, Belgium</location>
            <date-range>18&#8211;21 March 2008</date-range>
            <url>http://www.intensive.org/</url>
         </conference>
         <issn>1364-8535</issn>
         <pubdate>2008</pubdate>
         <volume>12</volume>
         <issue>Suppl 2</issue>
         <fpage>P11</fpage>
         <url>http://ccforum.com/content/12/S2/P11</url>
         <xrefbib>
            <pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/cc6232</pubid>
         </xrefbib>
      </bibl>
      <history>
         <pub>
            <date>
               <day>13</day>
               <month>3</month>
               <year>2008</year>
            </date>
         </pub>
      </history>
      <cpyrt>
         <year>2008</year>
         <collab>BioMed Central Ltd</collab>
      </cpyrt>
   </fm>
   <bdy>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Introduction</p>
         </st>
         <p>Bacteraemia developing in patients outside the hospital is categorized as community acquired. Accumulating evidence suggests that healthcare-related bacteraemia (HCRB) are distinct from those that are community acquired.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Methods</p>
         </st>
         <p>A prospective, observational study of all the patients with community-acquired bacteraemia sepsis (CABS) admitted to a tertiary, mixed, 12-bed ICU, at a university hospital, between 1 December 2004 and 30 November 2005. HCRB was defined according to criteria proposed by Friedman and colleagues <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B1">1</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Results</p>
         </st>
         <p>Throughout the study period, 160 patients were admitted with CABS; 50 (31%) had HCRB. In the CABS group the main focus of infection was respiratory (41%), intra-abdominal (15%) and endovascular (15%); in the HCRB group respiratory infection was present in 14 (28%) patients, intra-abdominal in 13 (26%) patients and urological in 10 (20%) patients (<it>P </it>= 0.227). The microbiological profile was different between the two groups: in the non-HCRB the main microbiological agents were Gram-positive 57 (63%), versus 34 (37%) Gram-negative. In the HCRB group the Gram-negative dominated the microbiological profile: 26 (65%) versus 34 (37%) (<it>P </it>= 0.003). The ICU crude mortality was different in both groups (52% in HCRB versus 34% in CABS, <it>P </it>= 0.028) and also hospital mortality (60% vs 39%, <it>P </it>= 0.013).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Conclusion</p>
         </st>
         <p>HCRB has a higher crude mortality and a different microbiological profile was shown in the present study. This knowledge should prompt the necessity for early recognition of patients with HCRB that would need a different therapeutic approach.</p>
      </sec>
   </bdy>
   <bm>
      <refgrp>
         <bibl id="B1">
            <title>
               <p>Health care-associated bloodstream infections in adults: a reason to change the accepted definition of community-acquired infections</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Friedman</snm>
                  <fnm>ND</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Kaye</snm>
                  <fnm>KS</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Stout</snm>
                  <fnm>JE</fnm>
               </au>
               <etal/>
            </aug>
            <source>Ann Intern Med</source>
            <pubdate>2002</pubdate>
            <volume>137</volume>
            <fpage>791</fpage>
            <lpage>797</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12435215</pubid>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
      </refgrp>
   </bm>
</art>
